Monday, October 31, 2005

 

A Scary Wack

Last night, to celebrate Halloween, I watched a flick I hardly ever pull out of my vast collection. It's a Dirk Yates directed All Worlds gay video called Men For All Seasons, and no, it isn't about Sir Thomas Beckett. It's a seasonally themed J/O film with five scenes. The first is a marine stroking beside a Christmas tree, then a hot blonde boy wacking on top of a collection of Valentines. We see a hot brunette doing some gardening and then pulling one off, next move to a hairy surfer catching a few waves and ultimately getting off in an out-door shower.

The final scene features my personal favorite porn stud Axel Garret in the strangest of all the scenes. This is the segment I watched last night to celebrate the holiday. In a secluded area, Axel drives up in his truck, the bed of which is loaded with pumpkins. He begins to unload the pumpkins and as he does, takes his shirt off. He soon becomes bored and jumps up on the tailgate and leans back against the pumpkins.



Well, one thing leads to another and soon he's opening his tight jeans and starting to jack-off. He pulls his pants down around his knees and climbs up further up on the pumpkins.


He works his large blonde dick, really polishing his prick, at one point licking his fingers and smearing the saliva all over his mushroom cock head. Soon the pants come off and he really strokes hard. But then, suddenly, he gets an idea and pulls his jack-knife (appropriately) out of his shirt pocket.


Axel cuts a round hole in one of the pumpkins and then -- I swear to God -- he fucks the gourd. We see him humping away, his cock plunging in and out of the pumpkin, his blonde pubes getting sticky. And we see his cock stabbing in and out of the orange jack-o-lantern from the inside. Finally, Axel throws down the pumpkin and cums all over himself.

It's a nice scene, but I think it must be one of Axel's first movies. The blonde hunk looks very young, he hasn't figured out yet that he has to look "into it" when the camera is on his face, and when he cums, the director holds the frame in a close-up of that huge cock. Well, Axel is a prodigious shooter, and so we miss where most of the jizz flies and falls.

But even so, it's a pretty good film. I try and watch it every Halloween. And because Axel is my favorite, while watching it he becomes both a Trick and a Treat.


Sunday, October 30, 2005

 

Str8 Pro Am

Ok, we all know I'm gay, so when I watch straight porn I'm looking at the guys, not the ladies. That's no surprise to anyone. I like straight porn-studs, and I like them because they're hot, handsome, sexual, masculine, and -- well -- straight. And we all know I like gay amateur porn, because of the guys are often straight, sexy, masculine and -- most importantly -- new. I haven't seen them before, I haven't stroked off to them before, and I really like that. And, yes, I jacked-off to another hot Sean Cody boy last night.

I recently rented a couple of DVDs of straight amateur porn, and -- Boy Howdy! -- is it disappointing. The reason? The woman in this sub-genre are amateurs, brand new, never before seen. The men however are the same old faces and cocks we've seen for years. Nothing wrong with these guys, just not what I expected. When I rent amateur porn, I really don't want to see Eric Everhard or Julian Rivers or Billy Glide or Tom Byron. And I especially don't want to see Ron Jeremy (Remember when Ron first appeared on the porn scene? He was young and hot and hairy and hung. Now, he's just disgusting.)

So the question; where can you find hot straight amateur porn, where both the men and the women are new-comers? Because that's what I want to jack-off to.

Friday, October 28, 2005

 

The Natural Habitat of the Northwest Porn Pig

I had dinner the other night with a couple friends, and a guy I had never met before (but he's hotter than hell and so I hope to see a lot more of him.) I've known the two guys for several years, but we are not close friends, we hang out when we can, about twice a year. As you might expect, considering it was a table of four gay men, the topic of conversation got around to stroke movies. By way of introduction to the new guy, I was presented as -- and I quote -- "a porn connoisseur."

I thought, Jesus, its not just my best friends any more, the even larger circle of acquaintances know about my "fixation." Is that good or bad? Okay, so I have like 300 video tapes and am now working on my DVD collection. Sure, I porn-surf the web for a couple hours a night. I know it's not common to masturbate almost every day of your life. But I'm still a productive member of society. I stay at the top of my profession in my city, and in a competitive, stressful industry. I volunteer my time to a number of worthy charities. I spend quality time with quite a few people, tending and nurturing many friendships. I have three God-Children I'm devoted to. And I'm politically active and involved.

Okay, maybe I'm being a little defensive. I don't mean to be, I don't feel that way. I was terribly amused by the conversation at the restaurant, and it somehow garnered me instant respect from the new guy. And, of course, I'm not alone, everyone at the table started talking about their favorite porn stars, and the newest DVDs each had rented or bought. I guess I'm just more vocal about my love of porn than most. And that's why I'm the one they all come to when they want to borrow some wacking material. We all have to be identified by something. I'm just known as the guy with the weak eyes and hairy palms.

Thursday, October 27, 2005

 

Last Night: Taboo II

For my evening pull last night I watched the second half of the 1982 straight classic Taboo II, produced by Kirdy Stevens. The sequel to the wildly popular and original Taboo, part two continues the story of a family caught up in incest. As I mentioned in earlier posts, I like my porn to have a naughty feeling, and the Taboo series explores incest in a very naughty way (which, needless to say, it already is.)

The film stars Kay Parker, Eric Edwards, Dorothy LeMay, Honey Wilder, Ron Jeremy (in a cameo at the orgy), and in the leading role, one of my favorites, Kevin James.

The sex is hot and there's an orgy near the end that is just fantastic. I love orgy sequences if they're well filmed (I have to know who's doing what to whom, it can't just be anonymous body parts flailing around), and the orgies in all the Taboo flicks are very well filmed.

The series continues to be produced today, I believe, but it's gotten cheap, thrown-together and stupid. If you're interested in straight hot incest stories, go with the original starring Parker and the amazing Mike Ranger, part two (as I did last night), or the third part featuring Jerry Butler and Blake Palmer, again with Parker and Wilder. If you go as far as part four, it's alright, but just alright. There is no orgy sequence (which the first three all offer) and it's beginning to get a little tepid. Kevin James makes a return, joined by Wilder and Ginger Lynn. Jamie Gillis, John Leslie and Francois Papillon also pop up. But any installment of the series after four, forget it. They become almost unwatchable.

Those first three though, and a good deal of part four, is classic, nasty straight 80s adult cinema. If you love great wack flicks, this is must see porn.

Wednesday, October 26, 2005

 

Sean & Wes

Lets talk about Sean Cody.

As I wrote earlier, I don't subscribe to pay porn sites, but if I were going to, the first one would be straight boy amateur site SeanCody.com. I think it's the hottest of all the "let's film some hot straight amateur guys" websites. A friend joined and downloaded some movies, which he shared with me. I love them, they're hotter than shit, and I watch them often. That's what I polished my prick to last night before bed.

Sean finds hot straight guys and gets them to do the most amazing things. And they don't even appear to be drunk. They tell about their sex lives, they jack-off, they let Sean's gay friends blow-them, they participate in circle-jerks, sometimes they'll even let a guy fuck them.

They do this, needless to say, for money. But, come on, there has to be some desire more prevalent then just the need for a little extra spending money. And besides, most of these guys don't look like they're starving. They're intelligent and articulate, they wear trendy, expensive clothes, and obviously have memberships to gyms. They're mostly young muscle studs who seem to know what they're doing when it come to posing and showing off the work they've been doing on their bodies.





Take Wes, the guy in the picture above. He did a solo for Sean, and then came back for his first blow-job from a man. That's the sequence I watched last night. Wes has a tight, tattooed torso (and tattoos usually do nothing for me), short cropped blonde hair, a huge cock and really nasty (in a very good way) low-hangers. The guy that blows him, boy-next-door type Grady, never takes his clothes off or even opens his fly, though in one shot you can see quite a stiff lump in his basket. They start with Grady massaging Wes. They're both dressed, Wes wearing jeans and a tight muscle shirt. The straight stud is obviously watching porn, though you never see what his eyes are glued to. After a couple minutes of this casual shoulder rub, Grady helps Wes out of his shirt, lightly feeling the amazing chest and nipples.

Grady even tastes one of those hot nips, before opening Wes' pants and pulling them off. You can plainly see through Wes' boxers the outline of the engorged mushroom head of his already hard cock, and when Grady pulls the shorts off, Wes is more than ready to go. And so for the next fifteen or twenty minutes every part of Wes between his stomach and his knees becomes spit slathered by Grady's hungry mouth and tongue. The cock is sucked in numerous positions, and the low hangers are treated with stunning attention and precision.



One of the most exciting parts of any Sean Cody film where man-on-man action happens, of course, is when these straight guys get rimmed for the first time. Women just aren't very interested in that activity, but we gay men love receiving it and love doing it (I know I do). Wes is surprised when Grady's tongue first finds its way up his ass-hole, but he sure as hell doesn't complain. Grady is a Grade-A (get it?) salad-tosser, and comes up with several innovative positions, allowing Wes the ultimate rimming experience while allowing us the ultimate view. Outstanding!



The scene ends with Grady lying on the bed, Wes sitting on his chest, jerking-off and blowing an amazingly large load onto the still clothed stud's face. The jizz drips down his cheeks, covers his chin, pools in his eyes, and, yes, some shoots into his open mouth. And, yes, Grady swallows it and then puts Wes' cock back in his mouth to clean it off.

And that's just one of Sean Cody's many movies. He must have nearly two hundred at his site. If, like me, you're cheap and don't want to pay the money, SeanCody.com is terrific because there is a ton of free pictures for each model (like the ones above.) Check it out at http://www.seancody.com/page.php?frame=home

And let me know what you think of the site. I'd love to hear from you.


Tuesday, October 25, 2005

 

The Plot Thickens

I've been thinking about my Titles post and exploring why I like older stroke-flicks better than newer ones. I watch a lot of amateur porn, both straight and gay, and I like it a lot. I have to admit though, I really love porn movies with strong plots, and as films have come to be more and more shot on video, plots generally seem to have disappeared.

Yes, there are occasional wackers today with plots, but they're getting harder and harder to find, especially in straight porn. It's so easy to throw two or three people in a room or by a pool or under a tree or in the back seat of a moderately sized car and have them go at it. Even the scant situational set-up is becoming extinct, like the Hot Young Pizza Boy knocking on the Nearly Naked Older Lady's door and inquiring, "Did you order the sausage?" Scenes begin now with everybody naked, hard, wet, and fucking.

Now, the level of acting in porn is a topic for an entirely different post, and maybe producers decided to do away with story lines because, let's face it, these actors aren't exactly Kevin Spacey or Dame Judi Dench. Sure, they all know who Ron Jeremy is, but few of them have ever even heard of Stanislavski.

And there certainly were plotless porn flicks shot on 35mm, but they were very rare. Movies today are meant to be purchased, taken home and watched over three or four sessions, so there are three or four points in those films intended to get you off. Pre-VCR movies wanted to keep you sitting (and stroking) in your theatre seat for the duration of the running time, and so the sexual situations were doled out in a slower progression.

Aye, there's the rub! I find that slower untangling of the story sexier. I like the fact that in pre-1985 movies the two featured protagonists would meet and there would be sexual tension, but, at that first meeting, that's all it was, a first meeting. Later they would get together, and after some necking and feeling each other up, maybe undress slowly; we see her seductively playing with her still bra covered nipples, we see him with a hard-on in his underwear. That hard-on is then slowly exposed, flipping up out of his shorts, a droplet of pre-cum flying onto her face. Then a blow-job, a pussy licking and ... he cums! They didn't necessarily fuck in that scene, that was saved for another upcoming segment.

That's hot to me. That's hotter to me than the couple instantly naked and fucking in the first scene, and, an even greater crime in my opinion, doing the same routine of sex acts in exactly the same order as everyone else in every other scene of the film. Like comedy, eroticism depends on surprise, and if I know what's going to happen before it happens, well, that's not sexy (or funny).

So I often go back to the classic porn films of my youth, both straight and gay, many of which, thankfully, have been preserved on DVD. The performers are hotter, it's easier to project myself into the situation, and the sex somehow just seems naughtier. Come to think of it, maybe I'm really projecting myself back to when I just turned 18 and started going to "Dirty Movies" in Seattle. There were three or four adult theatres in the downtown area then, and I hit them all. It did seem naughty; I was afraid of running into someone I knew, there was a thrill to it, and I would literally tremble. Paying your money at a box-office, walking in and your eyes slowly adjusting to that large dark space, lighted only by projected people fucking -- really fucking -- on the screen. And you never knew who was sitting near you in the dark, watching, masturbating. You just knew you were one of them, and you felt like you were getting away with something. And you were.

Sunday, October 23, 2005

 

Hairy Guys & You

I mentioned in an earlier post that I'm the Moderator of a MSN group called HairyMales. Okay, so you're probably guessing by now I like hairy guys. Well, it's true.

And this afternoon I Net-Stroked to one of my favorite free sites Hair Trigger http://group.freegayspace.com/hairtrigger/contents/ht1.html There's a picture below from the series that got me off today.

If you're into hairy and muscular guys, this site can't be beat (although you won't be able to stop yourself from beating!) There are hundreds of large format photos, far too many, I promise, to view on one visit. Check it out, you'll go back often, I promise. I do.



Saturday, October 22, 2005

 

Pay Sites & Previews

I enjoyed a marathon Web-Porning session last night, surfing for several hours, going to old stand-by sites as well discovering a few new ones. They were all either free sites, or the preview pages of pay sites. I don't subscribe to any pay sites because A) I'm cheap, and B) What they offer just isn't worth the money when there is so much free porn on the web. Why should I pay fifteen or twenty five or even thirty five bucks a month to see a very specific type of porn I may tire of very quickly?

Besides, once you join the Yahoo and MSN and Google adult groups, you have tons of pictures and video clips delivered daily right into your email inbox. So, why pay for porn that may end up boring you when there are more free sites than you could ever jack-off to?

Friday, October 21, 2005

 

That Which We Call "Porn" By Any Other Name

I don't mean this post to sound bitter at all, but if you follow this blog you know I prefer older porn movies to the newer videos. There are a lot of reasons why, but one of the lesser of those reasons is the titles these newer films carry. This is a much lesser reason why the newer ones aren't as entertaining for me, but still irksome.

Twenty years ago the title of a porn movie was going to be displayed on a marquee in the middle of downtown, and so that title had to be suggestive without being dirty. Both gay and straight porn had provocative titles, sure, but not just filthy for the sake of being filthy. They had titles you could read something nasty into if you wanted, but they didn't hit you over the head. Think of those movies you loved like Taboo, I Do, Deep Throat, I Like to Watch, Screen Play, Dirty Angels, Frat House Memories, Wet Afternoon, Playing With Fire, Deep Inside Jennifer Welles, Lollipop Palace, Pacific Coast Highway, Little French Maid. The list goes on and on.

But now what kind of titles do we get, now that films go straight to video stores where children and the prudish aren't allowed? Look at today's titles; Fuck Sluts, Cunt Hunt, Cock Whores, Cum Splatter, Hairy Men Who Take It In The Ass, Spunk Guzzlers. And then there are the Oscar worthy film take-off titles: Shaving Ryan's Privates, Sticky Business, Romancing The Bone, Jer's Ass-Kick Park, Mad Matt's Beyond Thunder-Cock.

I'm not offended by these titles, I feel they lack class, grace and subtlety. The earlier titles were slightly more intellectual, giving you an idea of what the film was about, and that said film was nasty, without the title being nasty itself. They were often clever and well thought out, not an idea someone had dead drunk at a party and pasted onto the next video that was finished.

And maybe that's my real complaint; when porn was shot on film, care was taken with the productions. They had to worry about lighting and the script and camera angles and continuity. A lot of today's shot-on-video porn feels thrown together and careless.

I wish we could get back to the good old titles. Leave vulgarities and puns to those of us who write these blogs.

Thursday, October 20, 2005

 

Gay & Str8 Wank

Last night I jacked off to two vids, one gay and one straight, one new and one old favorite.

My roommate got the DVD of a Jocks Video called Good as Gold, starring the adorably sexy, and very muscular Matthew Rush. It's okay, the guys are buff, hot and hung, but the sex is tragically predictable. Every scene, whether its a two way or a three way, contains exactly the same combination over and over; A sucks B, B sucks A, one rims the other, one tops the other in A) the missionary position, B) doggy, C) spooning, then they jerk-off until they shoot on their own belly. The only exception is a terrific bathhouse orgy scene with about 10 guys, but even that doesn't have the variety one would hope for. It does conclude with one guy having every one of the others shoot load after load all over him before he pulls one off himself.

The straight flick was an old tape of mine called Horny Holidaze (bad title, great film.) It's a European production with no stars I can name. It does feature one guy I find irresistible, and this is the only vid I've ever found him in. He has long blonde hair, a stunning, huge cock, and an ass you just want to bury your face in. He has a three-way scene in a bathroom with two women after he catches them doing each other and then falls into the bathtub. They have to get him out of those wet clothes! After his big cock is double sucked and he has eaten their pussys, he fucks both of them. One soon leaves to take care of another guy waiting in the livingroom. Our blonde hero fucks the other chick shooting all over her, then they join their friends in the front room. Then a third couple shows up, the man of which is dressed (I kid you not) as Father Christmas. They fuck in every possible (straight) combination, finishing with lots of hot cum dripping everywhere. As they are decompressing, a very unfortunate drag queen shows up (A Fellini moment if ever there was one) and chases the naked guys around the room, everyone laughing wildly, long, flacid cocks bouncing and swaying.

I love it, and it got me off explosively last night.

 

Amateur Fascination

Why do I find the new(ish) wave of amateur "straight guy" porn so hot? I don't know, maybe its because the guys are real, and most are presented as completely straight. As I mentioned in an earlier post, I discovered my favorite porn star, Axel Garret, in an amateur film. When Dirk Yates started producing his The Few, The Proud, The Naked series of hot, straight marines for All Worlds (of which I own several additions), he was pretty much the only one doing it. Maybe what's most surprising is he's still doing it. Along the way he morphed these exibitionist marines into a whole generation of new porn stars, turning out not just Axel, but Rod Barry, among many others.

Dirk started his series 15, maybe 20 years ago, before the internet was omnipresent. Now the amateur straight men are everywhere; Sean Cody, Hung Male Amateurs, Sharpshooters Video, Corbin Fisher, Amateur Straight Guys, Circle Jerk Boys, Straight Guys for Queer Eyes. And that's just a few of the websites and video studios (Sorry if I left out your favorite).

These amateur films can be kind of a mixed bag. You never know if the next guy is going to be jaw-droppingly handsome or your worst nightmare -- you know the type, the guy that looked, well, alright when you were drunk in the dim bar, but then you get him home and into the light and -- Yikes!

A friend gave me one of the many videos produced by Auntie Bob. http://auntiebob.com/ The title is Auntie Bob #17, and I rubbed one off to it yesterday afternoon. Of the four sequences, I find two stunningly hot and two duller than shit (there's that mixed bag).

The dull episodes feature obviously gay, un-buff (anti-buff?), uninteresting guys, which usually is at least fine. But in these kinds of videos I want to see muscular straight boys doing naughty things they know they shouldn't be doing. Tayler is an uninteresting twink jerking-off, the kind of thing you can see in any gay bar backroom or truckstop men's room. The other sequence features two flabby twinks, Mike and Jason, who do each other, something you can see in any bathhouse. Whatever. This may be your thing, and if it is go for it, but frankly it does nothing for me.

But the first and fourth episodes are so erotic they make up for any deficiencies in the rest of the film. In Part One we get to know a horny paratrooper named Mitch. He has a very hairy chest, as well as hairy pubes, cock, balls and ass. He wears an open baseball jersey and black jock strap pulled to the side so his cock stands out as he jacks-off. He is very vocal, moaning and talking dirty. Cameraman Auntie Bob helps him out, pinching his nipples, squeezing his balls, rubbing his pubes. Mitch shoots a load, then he and Bob chat for a while, Mitch's cock returns to full salute and he starts stroking again. Bob jumps in to help once more, this time sticking his fingers into Mitch's hairy asshole until he cums again. So fuckin' hot!




But the hottest sequence is the final one. TJ is a young guy who has come over to Auntie Bob's apartment to make a little extra spending money while his girl friend is away. Bob feels him up, opens his pants and produces an amazingly large, thick, hairy cock. After Bob strokes him a little, TJ jacks himself, then takes the camera and we see Bob suck TJ from the young man's point of view. Bob puts the camera on a tripod and bestows on TJ the blow-job of his life. This hot stud writhes, moans, screams, and then cums in Bob's mouth and all over his face and beard. It's an instant power climax for me.



So, I guess that explains what I find so hot about amateur porn. I like straight guys who give it up for easy cash. Now, some videos and websites just have the guys jacking-off and no one ever touches them, as opposed to what Auntie Bob gets away with. Some web sites talk the guys into having sex with each other (Sean Cody is big on this), and I find that really hot as well. I think its because these straight boys look so damn uncomfortable jacking, sucking, fucking, and frankly, just being naked and hard around each other. That's fun, somehow.

Some sites have the guys fuck women, usually in a gang bang situation, but are filmed for a gay audience focusing on the guy, and I like that a lot as well. But that's for another post.

I hope the amateur movement continues. I like it. It's hot, because the guys are always brand new, not the same old faces over and over, and they seem somehow obtainable even though they're straight. Amateur porn is one of my first choices when it comes time to pick porn for the night, or when I'm surfing on the pornagraph. Now all I wonder is, where are the guys in my neighborhood who will do this?

Tuesday, October 18, 2005

 

Money Shots

Not only do I watch porn, I share porn. I'm the moderator of a club at MSN called HairyMales http://groups.msn.com/HairyMales. I got a question from Matt, a club member, I thought might be interesting to discuss here as well.

Matt asked, What do you think of the "money shot"? For me watching, I want to see him cum inside his/her body. You can always tell when a guy is climaxing because of the actions. But when he pulls out for the "money shot," the viewer misses the reactions and facial expressions of the partner.

Well, honestly, Matt and everyone, I love the money shot. I love seeing the cum covering someone, particularity on the face or in the mouth. I suppose I like it because you know the sex is real. I always feel kind of cheated when a guy shoots his wad of goo inside, invisible to the viewer, even if you are shown a cream-pie afterwards so you know it really happened. I just think that final squirt is one of the sexiest things there is, whether it's on film or right in front of my face.

I know this kind of activity isn't "Safe Sex," which is something I always practice in my sex life. But, one must ask, are these films intended as realistic depictions of life or are they sexual fantasies? Aren't they intended to play into our secret desires; those things we'd all like to do but don't dare because we're afraid, or because society would ostracize us, or because our lover would walk out on us, or because we'd feel dirty afterwards? (That sentence was very long. I may be turning into George Bernard Shaw or William Faulkner.)

But I agree with Matt, I love seeing the face contort at the moment of climax. That's one of the reasons I love older porn, the stuff actually shot on film (But that topic is a whole other post). You always saw the "sex-face" as well as the cum shot in those films. I love both those things, and hate missing either one, and the combination is hotter than anything.

Monday, October 17, 2005

 

Your Name Is Axel?

A lot of folks ask me if Axel is my real name. It sounds like a porn name, I hear a lot. Well, yeah, I guess it does. That's because it isn't my real name -- it's my slutting around on the web name. And where did I come up with the name Axel? Well, from a porn star, as you probably guessed!

If you've been around gay porn at all during the last decade, you've heard of Axel Garret, one of the biggest stars to come out of Dirk Yates' All Worlds Studios. Almost fifteen years ago, he was a marine who needed a little extra cash. He started out doing jack-off vids, then graduated to jacking-off with other guys, then to hard core gay and bi porn, but only ever appearing as Trade.


He says he is completely straight, and he much prefers the bi-sexual films he's made to the gay ones. He's been in two bi films, Family Affair, an incest drama that's hotter than it sounds, and a Western, Miss Kitty's Litter (Yeah, that's really the title ... but the film is hotter than fuck.) His Dirk Yates jack-off flicks are stunningly sexy (he cums massive amounts, and shoots great distances -- truly impressive), the best being A Day in the Life of Axel Garret. Outstanding fuck films include Kiss Off (maybe the best gay porn film I've ever seen), Trade Off (with Ryan Idol), How the West Was Hung, and Reflections 2.

Retired for a few years, he made a come back (cum back?) a couple years ago, doing a jack-off sequence in a vid titled Where Are They Now? That's what I watched last night, and I never tire of his scene. He's gotten a little older, the blonde hair is receding very slightly, but he is still buff as shit, or buffer (he tells us in the film he works as a construction worker in North Idaho), and still has a hairy cock, terrific fuzz all over his amazing ass, and a smile that would melt the heart of the most cynical drag queen. There's a moment in the film when Axel is sitting in an arm chair, naked, jacking-off, casually chatting, when Dirk asks him to stand up. He does, and his cock is at full attention. He turns around slowly, and it is one of the most spectacular sights I've ever had the pleasure to see. So stunningly hot!

There are so many things that make this stud my favorite porn star, including all the above. And did I mention his huge cock that never seems to go soft? If I want to get off in a hurry, all I have to do is put on one of Axel's films, and I'll cum within a few minutes (that's unusual for me ... I'm kind of a long distance runner most of the time. In fact, sometimes that's a problem during sex. I can go almost all night, and a lot of guys just can't keep up ... slackers!)

And so, a few years ago, looking for a web name, the natural place to go was my favorite porn-stud, Axel Garret. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.


 

Would You Do Porn?

I was talking with a friend last night, hot young bi twink guy, 25 but looks 18 or less, and he was telling me how much he'd like to be a porn star. He says he doesn't care if it's with men or women, if he is fucking or being fucked, he'd like to do it for the fun and a little extra spending money (he's a student at a local University.)

It made me start thinking. There isn't much of a question whether I would ever be asked to appear in porn, even though I think it'd be fun to do. I would consider writing it, or directing it, certainly. But what psychological make up does it take to actively want to star in sex movies? Now don't get me wrong, I don't think there is anything wrong with those who want to do it, I applaud them. They have confidence in their sexuality, their bodies, their looks. In a perfect world, everyone would feel that good about themselves, no matter how they looked. As I mentioned in my last post, European sex stars are very comfortable in this way, and God bless them. But in America today? I think my buddy is very brave. So maybe I'll take some pictures of him and we'll see what we can do with them, sell them, put them on the web, whatever. That could be a lot of fun.

So how about you? Would you fuck on film for cash? Is it in your make-up? Would you be willing to do that? Have you ever done that? Humm. I'd love to hear from those of you who have.

Sunday, October 16, 2005

 

Devil in the Flesh & Euro Porn

Last night, after a looong evening of Porning on the web, before I went to bed, I pulled one off to a favorite scene from a vid called Devil in The Flesh from Private Studios. The scene features two of the hottest Euro-Studs; Frank Major and Nick Lang.

While being painted by a sexy female artist, Nick and his slave woman play with each other. Although fully clothed, he makes her lick a whip and then suck the handle while she feels his basket (he is wearing tight black pants and sitting with his legs wide open.) Frank comes into watch and Nick sends the slave over to give him a drink, feel his dick up, and then lick his chest, suck his huge cock, and fuck him. Nick joins in for a three-way, some DP, and finally, as is always the case in Private productions, a messy facial. The woman artist only watches very uncomfortably.

So, what's the deal with porn from Europe? Why do I find it so much hotter? Well, the Private stuff is stunningly well produced; high production standards, terrific lighting and camera work, gorgeous men and women, interesting stories (something I really like), fairly acceptable acting, and very hot sex. The guys aren't like American porn stars, Europeans aren't afraid to touch each other, fuck together, perform gang-bangs and be right next to the other guy, rubbing up against him. That's hot, knowing (or guessing) they're completely straight, but I think there's more to it. There is an openness to the Euro-Studs, sex isn't something unmentionable or nasty. It's fun, it's something to share and they don't seem embarrassed or ashamed by it. Sure, there are some USA film-fuckers who are that way, but they seem harder to find.

Another thing I find very hot about Euro-Studs is they don't all look alike. Some are hairy (kind of a fetish of mine), some are smooth, some are young, some are older, some are buff, some are ... well, less buff but still awfully damn fine, and all of them are at least fairly good looking, if not jaw-droppingly handsome in a movie star kind of way.

Euro porn is short on Woman-on-Woman action (which, as a gay man, I find dull), and very big on orgies and oral cum-shots, both of which I think are very, very hot.

My two cents? I think Devil in the Flesh is one of the best European porn flicks I've seen. I would very highly recommend it. It got me off in a hurry last night.

Saturday, October 15, 2005

 

What I'm Into & Reading

I serf porn on the web almost every day, and when something comes along on the web (or as we call the computer in my neighborhood -- "The Pornagraph") I'll be talking about that as well as my DVD/VCR watching.

Along the same lines, I'm reading a very interesting book right now about the straight porn biz titled The Other Hollywood; The Uncensored Oral History of the Porn Industry by Legs McNeil & Jennifer Osbourne. It isn't quite what I'd hoped it would be, it features a lot of the seeder side of the business (the MIPORN sting, the Wonderland murders, etc) as opposed to how porn evolved over the years, which is what I was most interested in. But I'm only about two thirds of the way through, so when I've finished reading it, I'll give the full review.

Anyone else been reading anything they'd like to talk about?

 

Watching Porn

Ok, I have to admit it, I watch a lot of porn. And I own a lot of porn. Straight, Bi, Gay, Fetish, Solo, Orgy, Classic, Brand New -- I love it all. Is it a collection or an obsession? Am I addicted to jacking-off to others having sex? Maybe, but that's not the focus of this blog. I thought it might be fun to record my thoughts about the porn of today, yesterday and tomorrow, in addition to what I watch when I watch it.

And, of course, I'd love to hear from others who enjoy porn as much as I do.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?